EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR): A Complete Business Guide

The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is more than just an environmental policy – it’s a market access filter that will soon redefine global trade. Starting in late 2025, companies importing or exporting key commodities to the EU must prove that their products are deforestation-free, legally produced, and fully traceable. Non-compliance could mean fines, product bans, or even exclusion from the EU market. This article breaks down what the EUDR means for businesses, which products are affected, and how to prepare for this critical regulatory shift.

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) represents one of the most ambitious sustainability laws ever adopted by the EU. For businesses operating in or exporting to the EU, it’s more than another compliance requirement. It’s a significant operational shift that demands transparency, traceability, and accountability across complex global supply chains.

With enforcement set to begin in late 2025, companies dealing in specific commodities and their derivatives must act now to ensure they are prepared. This article breaks down everything you need to know about the EUDR: what it is, who it affects, what compliance involves, and how to start preparing today.

What Is the EUDR and Why Was It Introduced?

The EUDR is designed to ensure that products placed on the EU market or exported from it are not linked to deforestation or forest degradation. It applies to key commodities that are often associated with environmental harm, including cattle, soy, palm oil, wood, cocoa, coffee, and rubber.

The law was adopted to reduce the EU’s role in global deforestation and support broader climate and biodiversity goals. It’s part of the EU’s Green Deal and complements other initiatives like the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

This regulation differs from earlier efforts by going beyond legality and requiring actual proof that products are deforestation-free. It also integrates human rights elements, including respect for indigenous land use rights.

Who Needs to Comply with the EUDR?

The EUDR applies to two main categories of economic actors:

• Operators: Companies or individuals that first place a relevant product on the EU market or export it from the EU.
• Traders: Anyone in the supply chain, other than operators, who makes the relevant product available on the EU market.

If you trade, sell, import, or export products linked to the EUDR’s listed commodities, you’re likely subject to its requirements. Even if you’re not directly an operator or trader, your clients may still require documentation or data from you to fulfill their due diligence obligations.

Important: While large companies must comply by 30 December 2025, micro and small enterprises have until 30 June 2026. However, the requirements remain rigorous for all, and early preparation is strongly advised.

What Products and Commodities Are Covered?

The EUDR targets seven high-risk commodities and a wide range of products derived from them. These include:

• Cattle: Cattle ranching is a leading driver of deforestation, especially in Latin America, where large tracts of forest are cleared for pasture. Including live cattle, fresh and frozen meat, edible offal, hides, skins, and leather products.
• Cocoa: Cocoa plantations have caused extensive forest loss in West Africa and Southeast Asia. Covering cocoa beans, shells, paste, butter, powder, and chocolate products.
• Coffee: Coffee farming leads to habitat fragmentation and biodiversity loss, especially with sun-grown methods. Roasted coffee, decaffeinated, husks and skins, coffee substitutes.
• Oil Palm: Palm oil is a major cause of deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia due to large-scale plantation development. Palm oil, palm kernel oil, glycerol, fatty acids, industrial oleochemicals.
• Rubber: Rubber expansion has replaced diverse natural forests with monoculture plantations. Raw rubber, tires, belts, hoses, industrial rubber products.
• Soya: Large-scale soy cultivation drives deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon and Cerrado regions. Soybeans, flour, meal, oil, oilcakes.
• Wood: Unsustainable logging is a persistent threat to primary forests worldwide. Comprehensive coverage from fuel wood to finished furniture, including pulp, paper, and prefabricated buildings.

Products are identified using EU customs (CN) codes listed in Annex I of the regulation. If a product’s code isn’t listed, it may be exempt. However, this should be verified on a case-by-case basis.

Key Requirements for Compliance

To place or export a relevant product on the EU market, three conditions must be met:

1. Deforestation-free: The product must not be linked to land deforested after 31 December 2020.
2. Legally produced: The product must comply with all applicable laws in the country of origin, including environmental, labor, and land use laws.
3. Due diligence statement: Companies must submit a formal statement confirming compliance through a centralized EU Information System.

What Is Due Diligence Under the EUDR?

Due diligence is at the heart of the regulation. Companies must establish a robust system to:

• Collect information: Gather data on commodity origin, supplier identities, geolocation coordinates of production plots, and volume.
• Assess risk: Evaluate the likelihood that the product comes from deforested land or is non-compliant with local laws.
• Mitigate risk: If there is more than negligible risk, take steps to eliminate or reduce it before market placement.

Risk mitigation could include:

• Requesting additional documentation from suppliers.
• Conducting independent audits or site inspections.
• Using forest monitoring technology or satellite data.

Geolocation and Traceability

Under the EUDR, geolocation is not a mere formality – it is one of the most technically demanding and legally critical aspects of compliance. Traceability to the exact plot of land where a commodity was grown or harvested forms the evidentiary backbone of proving that products are deforestation-free. Unlike many past regulations that relied on paperwork or supplier declarations, the EUDR mandates verifiable, spatially precise data that links each batch of goods to the physical location of its origin.

Why Geolocation Is Legally Essential

The rationale for this requirement is straightforward: to prove that no deforestation has occurred after the cutoff date of 31 December 2020, EU authorities must be able to independently confirm the land history. This means that every supply chain actor – from smallholder farms to global exporters – must capture and provide specific geographic coordinates for every plot of land involved in the production of covered commodities.

These coordinates, often expressed in decimal degrees (WGS84 format), allow enforcement agencies to use satellite monitoring tools to detect land-use change over time. The aim is to eliminate ambiguity by providing hard, location-based evidence that can be verified remotely and cross-checked against deforestation alerts, forest degradation maps, or satellite-based imagery archives.

But it’s not just about location. In addition to plot coordinates, companies must gather supplementary data: the size of the land area, the type of commodity grown, the identity of the farmer or supplier, and the specific time of harvest or production. This data must be stored securely and made available to regulatory authorities for at least five years, ensuring both traceability and accountability over time.

Operational Challenges in Real-World Supply Chains

Implementing geolocation at scale is not without its complications. Many upstream producers, particularly in tropical regions or rural economies, lack access to GPS tools or the digital literacy needed to record accurate coordinates. In some cases, land ownership is informal or undocumented, making it difficult to verify the legal status of the production site. Agricultural practices such as crop rotation, intercropping, or shared land use among multiple smallholders further complicate the traceability chain.

The fragmentation of global supply chains only adds to the complexity. One EU importer may be sourcing cocoa or coffee from dozens or even hundreds of farmers, each managing multiple plots over time. Coordinating this data collection effort – and doing so in a way that is reliable, consistent, and audit-ready – requires a level of systemization that many companies are not yet equipped for.

Strategic Solutions for Compliance

To meet EUDR’s traceability demands, companies will need to take a proactive and technology-enabled approach. This often involves integrating geolocation data capture into everyday agricultural workflows through mobile tools, farmer training programs, or on-the-ground technical assistance. In some cases, deploying third-party field teams or working with cooperatives and local associations can help bridge gaps in capacity.

More advanced supply chains are beginning to adopt satellite-based forest monitoring platforms that can track land-use changes in real time. Others are implementing digital supply chain mapping systems that interface with existing ERP or procurement systems, ensuring that geolocation and sourcing data are captured at the point of purchase. In particularly complex or high-risk sourcing environments, blockchain or QR-based traceability frameworks may offer a more tamper-proof and transparent solution.

Whatever the technology stack, the goal remains the same: build a reliable, verifiable link between the product and its land of origin – and ensure that this data can stand up to external scrutiny. Companies that invest early in these traceability systems will not only reduce their compliance risk but also gain long-term advantages in sustainability reporting, stakeholder transparency, and brand integrity.

Simplified Due Diligence for Low-Risk Countries

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) adopts a risk-based framework, which allows for simplified due diligence procedures for commodities originating from countries or regions identified as low risk. This system is intended to reduce the administrative burden on companies when sourcing from areas with a lower probability of deforestation or legal violations, while still maintaining the integrity and goals of the regulation.

Risk Categories

To implement this, the EU will classify countries or subnational regions into three distinct risk levels:

• Low risk: These are areas where there is a reduced likelihood of deforestation and better compliance with legal standards.
• Standard risk: This represents the baseline level, requiring companies to perform full due diligence as outlined in the regulation.
• High risk: Areas in this category demand enhanced due diligence, given the elevated risk of forest degradation or legal non-compliance.

These classifications are expected to be published by the European Commission no later than 30 June 2025. Until then, businesses are advised to treat all sources as either standard or high risk, applying the necessary checks accordingly.

Benefits of Low-Risk Classification

When a country or region is officially recognized as low risk, businesses that source commodities from these areas can benefit from a significantly streamlined due diligence process. One of the key advantages is the ability to bypass full-scale risk assessments. Since the likelihood of deforestation or legal non-compliance is deemed low, companies are not required to conduct the same in-depth evaluations that are mandatory for higher-risk regions.

Furthermore, mitigation procedures – which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive – are generally not required for low-risk sources, unless specific concerns or “red flags” arise. This means that businesses can allocate their compliance efforts more efficiently, concentrating resources on suppliers or regions where the risks are greater. Overall, sourcing from low-risk countries can help companies reduce operational complexity while maintaining alignment with regulatory obligations.

Minimum Requirements Still Apply

Despite the reduced burden for low-risk areas, the EUDR still imposes several minimum due diligence requirements that must be met by all companies, regardless of the risk classification of the country of origin. Firstly, businesses are obligated to collect geolocation data for the land from which their commodities originate. This ensures traceability and supports the EU’s broader deforestation monitoring goals.

Additionally, companies must submit formal due diligence statements to confirm their compliance with the regulation. These declarations serve as legal attestations that the products meet EUDR standards. Lastly, all supporting documentation must be securely stored for a minimum of five years. This archival requirement ensures that data is available for verification in the event of an audit or regulatory inquiry. Thus, while the process may be simplified for low-risk countries, the commitment to transparency and accountability remains unchanged.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The EUDR comes with a strict enforcement regime that makes compliance not only a legal requirement but also a business necessity. Failure to meet the obligations can lead to serious financial and reputational consequences.

Types of Enforcement Measures

EU member states are responsible for enforcing the regulation through a combination of risk-based inspections, document reviews and audits, on-site verifications, and even sampling and testing of commodities. These oversight mechanisms ensure that businesses adhere to their due diligence obligations under the EUDR.

Financial and Legal Penalties

Penalties for non-compliance under the EUDR include:

• Fines: Up to 4% of the company’s total EU turnover for the previous financial year.
• Product confiscation: Immediate seizure of non-compliant goods.
• Revenue confiscation: Authorities may reclaim profits made from non-compliant products.

These fines are proportional to the environmental harm and economic value of the products involved.

Additional Consequences

The implications of non-compliance extend beyond financial losses. Companies may be subject to market access restrictions, including temporary or permanent bans from placing goods on the EU market and suspension of export or import licenses. Public procurement bans may also apply, disqualifying businesses from participating in EU-funded contracts or supply chains for up to 12 months. Perhaps most damaging is the risk of public exposure: the European Commission may publicly disclose violations on its website, listing the company’s name, a summary of the offense, and the sanctions imposed. Such visibility can erode brand credibility, deter investors, and disrupt key business partnerships.

How to Avoid Penalties

To reduce risk of penalties, companies should:

• Conduct regular internal audits of due diligence systems.
• Monitor supplier compliance closely, especially in high-risk countries.
• Maintain detailed, accessible records of all geolocation and sourcing data.
• Stay informed on risk classifications and regulatory updates.
  Work with legal counsel or EUDR consultants to ensure ongoing alignment.
  

How to Prepare for the EUDR

With deadlines approaching, the time to act is now. A reactive approach will not suffice, especially given the documentation and system overhauls needed.

Step-by-step preparation plan:

• Map your supply chain: Identify which products fall under the EUDR and trace them to their source.
• Assess supplier readiness: Work with suppliers to gather geolocation data and ensure traceability.
• Build your compliance team: Assign responsibilities internally and educate staff about legal obligations.
• Set up data systems: Implement tools to collect, verify, and store required information securely.
• Create a due diligence system: Define how you’ll assess and mitigate risk across suppliers and products.
• Draft and submit due diligence statements: Use the EU’s Information System, which was launched on 4 December 2024.
• Plan for annual reporting: Maintain records for five years and report publicly starting in 2025.
  

Challenges and Practical Considerations

Adapting to the EUDR is not a straightforward task. Businesses of all sizes and sectors will encounter both technical and strategic challenges, many of which vary depending on the complexity of their supply chains, the commodities they handle, and regional factors influencing production and sourcing.

Data Collection Complexities

In sectors like agriculture, supply chains are often fragmented and involve numerous smallholder farmers. Collecting data from hundreds or even thousands of producers presents serious logistical and organizational hurdles. Companies are required to gather and verify several essential data points, including the geolocation coordinates of production plots, the time of harvesting or production, the country of origin and its applicable legal framework, supplier identities, transaction records, and product specifications such as volume and commodity type.

These requirements are further complicated by real-world obstacles. Many producers, particularly in rural or developing regions, do not maintain digital records or have access to GPS tools. Understanding geospatial mapping requirements may also be limited due to language or literacy barriers. In some regions, poor internet connectivity makes digital data collection and submission difficult, further hampering traceability efforts.

Supplier Cooperation and Readiness

Many upstream suppliers – especially those based outside the EU – are unfamiliar with the EUDR and may not be prepared to meet its requirements. They often lack awareness of the regulation, do not use digital tools for capturing data, and have no staff assigned to compliance or sustainability functions. These capacity gaps can significantly slow down the process of building traceable, compliant supply chains.

Solutions for Encouraging Compliance

To address these challenges, businesses can take several practical steps to improve supplier engagement and readiness for EUDR compliance. These measures help bridge knowledge and capacity gaps, particularly among smallholders and non-EU producers.

• Create supplier training programs. These programs should clearly explain EUDR requirements, using practical examples and locally relevant scenarios. Training can be delivered through workshops, online modules, or in partnership with local organizations.
• Offer compliance toolkits in local languages. Toolkits may include checklists, templates, mobile apps, and visual guides that simplify data collection and reporting. Localization is key to ensuring accessibility and effective understanding.
• Provide financial or technical incentives for traceability upgrades. Incentives such as cost-sharing for GPS devices, mobile data allowances, or access to traceability software can encourage suppliers to adopt the necessary tools and systems.
• Work with industry associations to standardize data collection. Collaboration across the industry can help align requirements, reduce duplication, and ease the compliance burden for producers supplying multiple buyers.

These steps, while requiring initial investment, can significantly improve supply chain transparency and ensure long-term compliance with EUDR requirements.

Technology Investments

Implementing the EUDR will require significant investments in data infrastructure. Businesses must adopt or upgrade systems that are capable of:

• Tracking commodity origin from plot to product.
• Storing and managing geolocation and transaction data.
• Integrating satellite imagery or forest monitoring tools.
• Generating and submitting due diligence statements.

Strategic investment areas may include traceability platforms such as Sourcemap or Open Supply Hub, which allow companies to visualize and manage multi-tier supply chains. Others are turning to remote sensing providers like Global Forest Watch or Satelligence for real-time monitoring of deforestation alerts. Blockchain-based systems (e.g., Circulor, Provenance) are also gaining popularity for their tamper-proof traceability.

Additionally, companies are implementing supplier onboarding and training portals, integrating traceability systems into ERP platforms, and using ESG dashboards to track compliance performance. These tools help reduce manual workloads and ensure data consistency across departments.

By using tested, scalable technologies, companies can build future-proof systems that not only ensure EUDR compliance but also strengthen overall sustainability practices.

Aligning with Other ESG Regulations

Many companies subject to the EUDR are also governed by overlapping ESG frameworks, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). Coordinating EUDR efforts with these frameworks can reduce reporting duplication, streamline data collection and validation, present a unified ESG message to investors and customers, and improve overall risk visibility.

The Role of External Consultants

For many companies – especially those without in-house ESG teams or experience managing global supply chains – working with external consultants can provide critical support throughout the EUDR compliance process.

These experts assist in:

• Mapping supply chains and identifying high-risk sourcing regions.
• Interpreting local legal frameworks to assess land tenure, environmental, and labor laws.
• Setting up compliant data systems, including geolocation capture and storage.
• Training internal staff and suppliers on EUDR requirements and documentation procedures.
• Auditing and validating data to ensure traceability is accurate and audit-ready.

Consultants also help avoid common pitfalls, such as relying on unverifiable supplier declarations, underestimating IT system requirements, or misclassifying product risks. By leveraging external expertise early, companies can streamline implementation, reduce compliance costs, and be better prepared for audits and enforcement actions.

Need Help Navigating EUDR Compliance?

Complying with the EU Deforestation Regulation is complex – and getting it wrong can be costly. Try EUDR.co – to help businesses of all sizes manage their EUDR obligations with clarity and confidence. From geolocation data collection and supply chain mapping to risk assessment and due diligence reporting, we offer expert guidance, tools, and tailored resources that simplify the entire compliance journey.

As companies face increasing pressure to meet strict legal, environmental, and traceability standards, our goal is to make sure you’re fully prepared ahead of the December 2025 enforcement deadline. With EUDR.co, you don’t just meet the requirements – you stay ahead of them.

Conclusion

The EU Deforestation Regulation is not just another layer of red tape – it’s a transformative force in global trade. By requiring proof that products are deforestation-free, legally produced, and fully traceable, the EUDR demands a new level of accountability from businesses that source, manufacture, or trade in high-risk commodities.

As the 2025 and 2026 deadlines approach, companies have a narrow window to act. Those who start early, invest in smart traceability systems, and engage transparently with suppliers will not only avoid penalties but gain a real competitive edge. Compliance with EUDR isn’t simply about avoiding risk – it’s about building a stronger, more sustainable business foundation for the future.

FAQ